A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between future neighbours about the construction of a wall at a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide interest pursuing an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier and the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a very publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above design is effective at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, look for to construct their family members house. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, wherever advancement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of recognized citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying made by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries in their internet site, leading to an encroachment on the Special Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have lasting ecological outcomes, significantly in a very delicate coastal atmosphere for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, which is partially created, is in the right posture. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where by sights of The ocean are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts from the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-higher h2o all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, an image which includes considering that grow to be emblematic from the depth in the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they ended up intended to Acquire visual evidence of the wall’s position relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from your sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult males entered the water all through intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become one of the most hanging descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately from the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute while in the authorized timeline.
On the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and problems attached to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their motion is motivated by issue for environmental safety and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public see, insisting rather that it's about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have described their long-standing link to the area as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair basically trying to build a relatives residence in accordance Using the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Exclusive Area of Conservation and say that each one will work have already been performed according to Qualified advice and accredited ideas. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, tend not to alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition a large number of observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from extremely different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous With all the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-large h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting both the physical René Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times actuality with the coastline as well as symbolic nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom ought to ascertain whether or not the wall as designed complies with scheduling authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing circumstances. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another prolonged after the lawful expenditures are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development operates at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a place of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will in the end be altered, taken off, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s conclusions. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable continue to appear in headlines, joined indelibly to The most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin lately.